<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Speech Recognition Macros Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davestronach.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/windows-speech-recognition-macros-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davestronach.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/windows-speech-recognition-macros-revisited/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://davestronach.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/windows-speech-recognition-macros-revisited/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davestronach.wordpress.com/?p=5#comment-15</guid>
		<description>You could give up Scots and talk American.  If John Barrowman can do it then so can you (although your preference may differ).

That&#039;s quite an annoying limitation.  I haven&#039;t used Vista speech yet and I was looking forward to not rhyming &quot;a&quot; with &quot;Hogmanay&quot; and &quot;the&quot; with &quot;Dundee&quot;, and creating a special word pronounced &quot;perry odd&quot; to mean &quot;not the end of the sentence&quot;.  I&#039;m told the new speech facilities are greatly improved otherwise as well.  But cross off one of the advantages?

I wonder if this can be worked around by triggering some sort of macros with a &quot;run program&quot; voice command?  Or is that what is broken?  I have also been enjoying using a product called AutoHotkey which can make Windows do clever things including rewriting what you type, but when I looked last it was not speech friendly yet - but you could run it as a command.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could give up Scots and talk American.  If John Barrowman can do it then so can you (although your preference may differ).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s quite an annoying limitation.  I haven&#8217;t used Vista speech yet and I was looking forward to not rhyming &#8220;a&#8221; with &#8220;Hogmanay&#8221; and &#8220;the&#8221; with &#8220;Dundee&#8221;, and creating a special word pronounced &#8220;perry odd&#8221; to mean &#8220;not the end of the sentence&#8221;.  I&#8217;m told the new speech facilities are greatly improved otherwise as well.  But cross off one of the advantages?</p>
<p>I wonder if this can be worked around by triggering some sort of macros with a &#8220;run program&#8221; voice command?  Or is that what is broken?  I have also been enjoying using a product called AutoHotkey which can make Windows do clever things including rewriting what you type, but when I looked last it was not speech friendly yet &#8211; but you could run it as a command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
